https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780460 HC dismissed the petition and upheld the trial court's order directing refund of Rs.1 lakh to the accused. The appellate court had set aside the earlier conviction and compensation order, and no interim compensation or order exists in the subsequent complaint filed by the complainant; accordingly the complainant cannot adjust the deposited amount against the fresh proceedings. The trial court correctly found the accused entitled to refund, and the HC found no perversity or illegality warranting interference. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:23:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780460 HC dismissed the petition and upheld the trial court's order directing refund of Rs.1 lakh to the accused. The appellate court had set aside the earlier conviction and compensation order, and no interim compensation or order exists in the subsequent complaint filed by the complainant; accordingly the complainant cannot adjust the deposited amount against the fresh proceedings. The trial court correctly found the accused entitled to refund, and the HC found no perversity or illegality warranting interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780460