<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780500</link>
    <description>A domestic company that exercised the section 115BAA option was treated as taxable at 22% on its income, including long-term capital gains, because the concessional regime governed the company&#039;s applicable tax rate once elected. The Tribunal accepted the Revenue&#039;s position that section 115BAA displaced the company&#039;s plea for a 20% rate under section 112, and the lower rate claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780500</link>
      <description>A domestic company that exercised the section 115BAA option was treated as taxable at 22% on its income, including long-term capital gains, because the concessional regime governed the company&#039;s applicable tax rate once elected. The Tribunal accepted the Revenue&#039;s position that section 115BAA displaced the company&#039;s plea for a 20% rate under section 112, and the lower rate claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>