<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47612</link>
    <description>Rule 57B provided a special credit entitlement for goods used as fuel and operated notwithstanding Rule 57A, so the 10% ad valorem restriction in the 1 March 1994 notification did not apply to furnace oil credit under Rule 57B for the relevant period before 1 June 1998; credit was allowable to the extent of duty actually paid, subject to the later amended regime. By contrast, Rule 57A credit remained expressly confined by the 10% ad valorem limit in the notification as amended on 3 May 1997, and the later explanation only clarified the meaning of inputs without expanding the credit quantum. The result was partial relief, with the Rule 57A restriction upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47612</link>
      <description>Rule 57B provided a special credit entitlement for goods used as fuel and operated notwithstanding Rule 57A, so the 10% ad valorem restriction in the 1 March 1994 notification did not apply to furnace oil credit under Rule 57B for the relevant period before 1 June 1998; credit was allowable to the extent of duty actually paid, subject to the later amended regime. By contrast, Rule 57A credit remained expressly confined by the 10% ad valorem limit in the notification as amended on 3 May 1997, and the later explanation only clarified the meaning of inputs without expanding the credit quantum. The result was partial relief, with the Rule 57A restriction upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>