<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780508</link>
    <description>ITAT (DEL) held that s.50C does not apply to the purchaser in a slump sale; instead s.56(2)(vii)(b) may apply and the AO erred in adopting stamp circle rates. The matter was remitted for the AO to refer land and building valuation to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), who must hear the buyer, avoid using circle rates for the relevant period, and report fair market values; any excess over the reported consideration will be taxed under s.56(2)(vii)(b), with the balance of purchase price allocated to goodwill and depreciation allowed accordingly. Claim for depreciation on non-compete fee denied following jurisdictional HC precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780508</link>
      <description>ITAT (DEL) held that s.50C does not apply to the purchaser in a slump sale; instead s.56(2)(vii)(b) may apply and the AO erred in adopting stamp circle rates. The matter was remitted for the AO to refer land and building valuation to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), who must hear the buyer, avoid using circle rates for the relevant period, and report fair market values; any excess over the reported consideration will be taxed under s.56(2)(vii)(b), with the balance of purchase price allocated to goodwill and depreciation allowed accordingly. Claim for depreciation on non-compete fee denied following jurisdictional HC precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>