<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47611</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q is admissible on crushers, conveyor belts and related parts installed at mines where they are used to obtain crushed limestone and move it to the factory for cement manufacture. The governing principle is that capital goods and material-handling equipment used to transport raw material from the mining site to the factory can qualify for credit when supported by settled precedent on identical facts. The discussion relies on the Supreme Court&#039;s later view in Birla Corporation Ltd. and similar decisions accepting such claims, so the Revenue cannot insist on a contrary position on the same factual matrix.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47611</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57Q is admissible on crushers, conveyor belts and related parts installed at mines where they are used to obtain crushed limestone and move it to the factory for cement manufacture. The governing principle is that capital goods and material-handling equipment used to transport raw material from the mining site to the factory can qualify for credit when supported by settled precedent on identical facts. The discussion relies on the Supreme Court&#039;s later view in Birla Corporation Ltd. and similar decisions accepting such claims, so the Revenue cannot insist on a contrary position on the same factual matrix.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>