https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780512 Writ jurisdiction remained available against Section 201 orders because the challenge went to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction, and the existence of an appeal did not bar relief where the issue had already been decided between the same parties. On identical facts, the Assessing Officer could not sustain orders contrary to a binding Tribunal ruling unless that ruling had been stayed or displaced by a competent court. The impugned Section 201 orders were therefore quashed, but the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer (TDS) to proceed from the stage of issuance of show cause notice in accordance with the earlier direction. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:23:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780512 Writ jurisdiction remained available against Section 201 orders because the challenge went to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction, and the existence of an appeal did not bar relief where the issue had already been decided between the same parties. On identical facts, the Assessing Officer could not sustain orders contrary to a binding Tribunal ruling unless that ruling had been stayed or displaced by a competent court. The impugned Section 201 orders were therefore quashed, but the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer (TDS) to proceed from the stage of issuance of show cause notice in accordance with the earlier direction. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780512