<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1320 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780523</link>
    <description>HC disposed the writ petition and directed that if the petitioner files a fresh representation regarding alleged illegal deductions and recomputation of the normative rate to include the GST component, the concerned authorities must decide it in accordance with law within three months from filing. The court did not adjudicate the merits and confined relief to the statutory process by ordering prompt consideration of the representation. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1320 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780523</link>
      <description>HC disposed the writ petition and directed that if the petitioner files a fresh representation regarding alleged illegal deductions and recomputation of the normative rate to include the GST component, the concerned authorities must decide it in accordance with law within three months from filing. The court did not adjudicate the merits and confined relief to the statutory process by ordering prompt consideration of the representation. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>