<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1628 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464444</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that where defective goods are returned to the factory and are not subjected to any process or cleared as scrap, the assessee must reverse the entire CENVAT credit claimed on receipt of those goods under Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal affirmed consistent precedent and set aside contrary findings, concluding reversal is mandatory in such circumstances. The matter is to be placed before a Single Member Bench for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:13:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1628 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464444</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that where defective goods are returned to the factory and are not subjected to any process or cleared as scrap, the assessee must reverse the entire CENVAT credit claimed on receipt of those goods under Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal affirmed consistent precedent and set aside contrary findings, concluding reversal is mandatory in such circumstances. The matter is to be placed before a Single Member Bench for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>