<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1633 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464454</link>
    <description>ITAT-Ahmedabad set aside the revision order under section 263 and allowed the appeal. The tribunal found no specific defect in the assessment identified by the PCIT nor any demonstration that the assessment prejudiced Revenue. The AO had considered the sale deed (with translation) and the assessee had explained the cash deposit as part of immovable property sale; therefore there was no lack of enquiry warranting revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1633 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464454</link>
      <description>ITAT-Ahmedabad set aside the revision order under section 263 and allowed the appeal. The tribunal found no specific defect in the assessment identified by the PCIT nor any demonstration that the assessment prejudiced Revenue. The AO had considered the sale deed (with translation) and the assessee had explained the cash deposit as part of immovable property sale; therefore there was no lack of enquiry warranting revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>