<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1719 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464464</link>
    <description>HC upheld ITAT and quashed reassessment, ruling reopening bad in law. The assessee produced loan documentation, bank statements, income tax return, balance-sheet, loan confirmation and the lender&#039;s assessment order to substantiate a Rs. 40 lakh advance from a company; the loan was repaid in a subsequent year. The AO relied solely on a single director&#039;s statement and denied cross-examination. Tribunal&#039;s finding that the reassessment lacked valid grounds was affirmed, decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:27:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1719 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464464</link>
      <description>HC upheld ITAT and quashed reassessment, ruling reopening bad in law. The assessee produced loan documentation, bank statements, income tax return, balance-sheet, loan confirmation and the lender&#039;s assessment order to substantiate a Rs. 40 lakh advance from a company; the loan was repaid in a subsequent year. The AO relied solely on a single director&#039;s statement and denied cross-examination. Tribunal&#039;s finding that the reassessment lacked valid grounds was affirmed, decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>