https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469 An adjudicatory order that discloses no meaningful reasoning and indicates non-application of mind cannot be sustained. The impugned order was therefore quashed because it was made without effective reasons, and a bare reference to rectification did not cure that defect. The affected party was entitled to a fresh hearing and reconsideration before a new order was passed, with restoration of the impugned order only if the certified copy of the court order was not communicated. The proceeding succeeded and the matter was remitted for fresh decision-making after hearing. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469 An adjudicatory order that discloses no meaningful reasoning and indicates non-application of mind cannot be sustained. The impugned order was therefore quashed because it was made without effective reasons, and a bare reference to rectification did not cure that defect. The affected party was entitled to a fresh hearing and reconsideration before a new order was passed, with restoration of the impugned order only if the certified copy of the court order was not communicated. The proceeding succeeded and the matter was remitted for fresh decision-making after hearing. Case-Laws GST Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469