https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469 The HC found the taxpayer's reply was rejected for lack of sufficient documentary evidence and that the authority demonstrated non-application of mind, noting the reply was considered on the last day of extended time. The impugned order was set aside and quashed, and the petition was disposed of. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469 The HC found the taxpayer's reply was rejected for lack of sufficient documentary evidence and that the authority demonstrated non-application of mind, noting the reply was considered on the last day of extended time. The impugned order was set aside and quashed, and the petition was disposed of. Case-Laws GST Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464469