https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47596 The HC allowed the petition, quashing the CESTAT Registry's action of returning the ROM Application as time-barred. The Court held that the limitation period should be computed from the date of receipt of the order, not the original order date. The Registry was instructed to circulate the application for hearing, and the petitioner was ordered to pay costs to the respondents. The rule was made absolute, addressing issues of concessional duty denial, order service, and limitation period computation. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47596 The HC allowed the petition, quashing the CESTAT Registry's action of returning the ROM Application as time-barred. The Court held that the limitation period should be computed from the date of receipt of the order, not the original order date. The Registry was instructed to circulate the application for hearing, and the petitioner was ordered to pay costs to the respondents. The rule was made absolute, addressing issues of concessional duty denial, order service, and limitation period computation. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47596