<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 271AAB penalty requires quantified undisclosed income; appeal remitted for fresh, reasoned adjudication to reconsider seized documents and compute penalty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93687</link>
    <description>ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) directing a fresh, reasoned adjudication. The Tribunal held that penalty under section 271AAB can be levied only on quantified &quot;undisclosed income&quot; as defined in the Explanation, and observed the AO failed to identify entries, transactions or seized documents forming the basis of any undisclosed income. CIT(A) erred by upholding the penalty without a speaking order addressing computation and reasons as required by law. The matter is remitted for the CIT(A) to consider the assessee&#039;s submissions, ascertain and quantify any undisclosed income on the basis of seized documents, and pass a detailed speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 271AAB penalty requires quantified undisclosed income; appeal remitted for fresh, reasoned adjudication to reconsider seized documents and compute penalty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93687</link>
      <description>ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) directing a fresh, reasoned adjudication. The Tribunal held that penalty under section 271AAB can be levied only on quantified &quot;undisclosed income&quot; as defined in the Explanation, and observed the AO failed to identify entries, transactions or seized documents forming the basis of any undisclosed income. CIT(A) erred by upholding the penalty without a speaking order addressing computation and reasons as required by law. The matter is remitted for the CIT(A) to consider the assessee&#039;s submissions, ascertain and quantify any undisclosed income on the basis of seized documents, and pass a detailed speaking order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>