https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780387 Article 226 writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar or to challenge judicial orders of a Special Court refusing discharge in proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act; the challenge to the charge-sheet and discharge orders was therefore held not maintainable. Alleged exoneration in departmental proceedings and a later resignation of one accused did not justify interference with the criminal case, especially where that ground was not part of the original pleadings and was raised only later by affidavit. The criminal prosecution was allowed to continue. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780387 Article 226 writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar or to challenge judicial orders of a Special Court refusing discharge in proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act; the challenge to the charge-sheet and discharge orders was therefore held not maintainable. Alleged exoneration in departmental proceedings and a later resignation of one accused did not justify interference with the criminal case, especially where that ground was not part of the original pleadings and was raised only later by affidavit. The criminal prosecution was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780387