<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780390</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s finding that the contested supply constituted inter-state sale rather than a stock transfer, dismissing the writ petition. The court declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s factual conclusions, noting the mixed question of law and fact and criticizing the authority&#039;s generalized rejection of the stock-transfer claim based on a few isolated transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s order was confirmed and the petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1187 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780390</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s finding that the contested supply constituted inter-state sale rather than a stock transfer, dismissing the writ petition. The court declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s factual conclusions, noting the mixed question of law and fact and criticizing the authority&#039;s generalized rejection of the stock-transfer claim based on a few isolated transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s order was confirmed and the petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>