<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1194 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780397</link>
    <description>CESTAT held the show cause notice unsustainable where receipts were not tied to specific taxable categories and set aside the demand raised by a statement under s.73(1A) as grounds differed from earlier SCN. The appellant, constituted under a state Act, was held to be a Governmental Authority; most statutory charges, initial deposits and allottee receipts were non-taxable, and reverse charge for legal services did not apply. Demands for commercial construction were remitted to the adjudicating authority for quantification; interest to apply. Penalty under s.70 read with Rule 7C was upheld. Appeals partially allowed and matter remanded for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1194 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780397</link>
      <description>CESTAT held the show cause notice unsustainable where receipts were not tied to specific taxable categories and set aside the demand raised by a statement under s.73(1A) as grounds differed from earlier SCN. The appellant, constituted under a state Act, was held to be a Governmental Authority; most statutory charges, initial deposits and allottee receipts were non-taxable, and reverse charge for legal services did not apply. Demands for commercial construction were remitted to the adjudicating authority for quantification; interest to apply. Penalty under s.70 read with Rule 7C was upheld. Appeals partially allowed and matter remanded for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>