https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47585 The domestic industry's injury claim was upheld because the relevant comparison showed rising stocks, higher imports from the subject countries, and falling profitability and realisation during the period of investigation. Anti-dumping duty could not be extended to Styrene Butadiene Rubber cleared under heading 3903.90, as the Designated Authority had confined the product scope to specified goods under heading 4002.19; the Tribunal's treatment of that issue as a clerical omission was rejected. The Tribunal also could not convert the duty from rupee terms into US dollar terms, since the original duty was imposed in rupees and there was no basis on the record for altering that formulation. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47585 The domestic industry's injury claim was upheld because the relevant comparison showed rising stocks, higher imports from the subject countries, and falling profitability and realisation during the period of investigation. Anti-dumping duty could not be extended to Styrene Butadiene Rubber cleared under heading 3903.90, as the Designated Authority had confined the product scope to specified goods under heading 4002.19; the Tribunal's treatment of that issue as a clerical omission was rejected. The Tribunal also could not convert the duty from rupee terms into US dollar terms, since the original duty was imposed in rupees and there was no basis on the record for altering that formulation. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47585