https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780417 ITAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the CIT(Exemptions) order denying section 80G deductions. The tribunal found the assessee produced Form 10B audits alleging no expenditure for private religious benefit and contended any religious activity was incidental and within the 5% threshold under s.80G(5B). ITAT held the CIT(Exemptions) failed to quantify or verify religious versus charitable expenditure, and denied the assessee an opportunity to respond. The matter is remitted for fresh examination of the nature and quantum of expenditures and compliance with s.80G(5), with opportunity to the assessee to be heard. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780417 ITAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the CIT(Exemptions) order denying section 80G deductions. The tribunal found the assessee produced Form 10B audits alleging no expenditure for private religious benefit and contended any religious activity was incidental and within the 5% threshold under s.80G(5B). ITAT held the CIT(Exemptions) failed to quantify or verify religious versus charitable expenditure, and denied the assessee an opportunity to respond. The matter is remitted for fresh examination of the nature and quantum of expenditures and compliance with s.80G(5), with opportunity to the assessee to be heard. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780417