<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1215 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780418</link>
    <description>ITAT held that during the IBC moratorium the Income Tax Department may determine tax liability but lacks authority to initiate recovery of dues; recovery actions during moratorium contravene sections 14/33(5) of IBC. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order that dismissed the corporate debtor&#039;s appeal in limine, restored the matter to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s analysis, and allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1215 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780418</link>
      <description>ITAT held that during the IBC moratorium the Income Tax Department may determine tax liability but lacks authority to initiate recovery of dues; recovery actions during moratorium contravene sections 14/33(5) of IBC. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order that dismissed the corporate debtor&#039;s appeal in limine, restored the matter to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s analysis, and allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>