<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780420</link>
    <description>Aircraft leasing income from a dry lease to Indian airlines was treated as not taxable in India where the Irish lessors held valid tax residency certificates, carried on genuine business activity, and no sham, round-tripping, or dominant tax-avoidance purpose was shown. Treaty relief could not be denied merely by invoking the MLI Principal Purpose Test without domestic incorporation through notification under section 90(1), and the facts did not establish a fixed place permanent establishment because the aircraft were not at the lessors&#039; disposal. Delayed payment or penal charges for lease rentals were also held not taxable, as they were not business income in the absence of a PE and were excluded from ordinary interest treatment under the treaty; relief was extended consistently with the exempt lease rentals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780420</link>
      <description>Aircraft leasing income from a dry lease to Indian airlines was treated as not taxable in India where the Irish lessors held valid tax residency certificates, carried on genuine business activity, and no sham, round-tripping, or dominant tax-avoidance purpose was shown. Treaty relief could not be denied merely by invoking the MLI Principal Purpose Test without domestic incorporation through notification under section 90(1), and the facts did not establish a fixed place permanent establishment because the aircraft were not at the lessors&#039; disposal. Delayed payment or penal charges for lease rentals were also held not taxable, as they were not business income in the absence of a PE and were excluded from ordinary interest treatment under the treaty; relief was extended consistently with the exempt lease rentals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>