<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780437</link>
    <description>ITAT held that reassessment under section 147 was invalid because the reasons recorded by the AO were based on incorrect facts and showed no application of mind. The AO misstated sale quantities and values in alleged penny-stock transactions and made additions inconsistent with the assessment record. Reopening and the resultant assessment were held bad in law; appeal allowed in favour of the assessee and additions set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780437</link>
      <description>ITAT held that reassessment under section 147 was invalid because the reasons recorded by the AO were based on incorrect facts and showed no application of mind. The AO misstated sale quantities and values in alleged penny-stock transactions and made additions inconsistent with the assessment record. Reopening and the resultant assessment were held bad in law; appeal allowed in favour of the assessee and additions set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>