<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 111 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47582</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the supplier&#039;s registration certificate was issued after the invoices, where the invoices contained the prescribed particulars and the supplier had applied for registration within the relevant time. The Board circular and transitional notifications were read as not requiring registration by the cut-off date, and the cut-off limited only administrative discretion to accept documents. Technical non-compliance without prejudice to revenue was insufficient where the transaction was genuine and the scheme&#039;s object was substantially satisfied, so the credit was directed to be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 111 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47582</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the supplier&#039;s registration certificate was issued after the invoices, where the invoices contained the prescribed particulars and the supplier had applied for registration within the relevant time. The Board circular and transitional notifications were read as not requiring registration by the cut-off date, and the cut-off limited only administrative discretion to accept documents. Technical non-compliance without prejudice to revenue was insufficient where the transaction was genuine and the scheme&#039;s object was substantially satisfied, so the credit was directed to be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>