<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780456</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeal on merits, without reference to limitation, if it is filed within the time granted by the court. The operative effect is that the petitioner may pursue the statutory appellate remedy and have the matter considered substantively, subject to compliance with the time allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780456</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeal on merits, without reference to limitation, if it is filed within the time granted by the court. The operative effect is that the petitioner may pursue the statutory appellate remedy and have the matter considered substantively, subject to compliance with the time allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>