<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1974 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464426</link>
    <description>ITAT RAJKOT set aside the CIT&#039;s order refusing registration under s.12AA and remitted the application for fresh decision. The tribunal found the rejection-based on absence of expense evidence and certain trust-deed clauses-unsustainable in light of later authority recognizing similar trust instruments as charitable and registrable; accordingly the CIT was directed to reconsider the registration application afresh applying that ratio. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 19:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1974 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464426</link>
      <description>ITAT RAJKOT set aside the CIT&#039;s order refusing registration under s.12AA and remitted the application for fresh decision. The tribunal found the rejection-based on absence of expense evidence and certain trust-deed clauses-unsustainable in light of later authority recognizing similar trust instruments as charitable and registrable; accordingly the CIT was directed to reconsider the registration application afresh applying that ratio. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>