<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1553 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464430</link>
    <description>ITAT (Raipur) refused condonation of an unexplained ~8-year delay in filing appeal, finding the appellant negligent and failing to provide bona fide reasons. Citing strict construction of limitation law and the clean-hands principle, the Tribunal declined to exercise discretion under Section 5 and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation without considering merits. The request for condonation was denied owing to inordinate delay, negligence, and absence of sufficient justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 19:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1553 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464430</link>
      <description>ITAT (Raipur) refused condonation of an unexplained ~8-year delay in filing appeal, finding the appellant negligent and failing to provide bona fide reasons. Citing strict construction of limitation law and the clean-hands principle, the Tribunal declined to exercise discretion under Section 5 and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation without considering merits. The request for condonation was denied owing to inordinate delay, negligence, and absence of sufficient justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>