<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464419</link>
    <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, only undisclosed income supported by evidence found during search, or material directly relatable to that evidence, can be assessed; additions based solely on regular books, legal interpretation of exemptions, or post-search enquiries fall outside the block assessment and were deleted. Interest under section 158BFA(1) was treated as mandatory simple interest with no discretion to waive or reduce it and was sustained. Surcharge was also held to follow the applicable charging framework and was not deleted. The result was mixed, with major additions removed for lack of search-linked evidence but interest and surcharge upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464419</link>
      <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, only undisclosed income supported by evidence found during search, or material directly relatable to that evidence, can be assessed; additions based solely on regular books, legal interpretation of exemptions, or post-search enquiries fall outside the block assessment and were deleted. Interest under section 158BFA(1) was treated as mandatory simple interest with no discretion to waive or reduce it and was sustained. Surcharge was also held to follow the applicable charging framework and was not deleted. The result was mixed, with major additions removed for lack of search-linked evidence but interest and surcharge upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>