<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47565</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay set aside the order of the Settlement Commission remitting proceedings back to the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs due to the applicant&#039;s non-cooperation attributed to the lack of engagement of counsel. The Court deemed the grounds for non-cooperation as unsustainable, but in the interest of justice, ordered the proceedings to be remitted back to the Settlement Commission for decision. The petitioner&#039;s counsel undertook to cooperate and not seek further adjournments. The Court expected the Commission to expedite the disposal of the remitted proceedings within three months. No specific costs were awarded in the disposition of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47565</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay set aside the order of the Settlement Commission remitting proceedings back to the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs due to the applicant&#039;s non-cooperation attributed to the lack of engagement of counsel. The Court deemed the grounds for non-cooperation as unsustainable, but in the interest of justice, ordered the proceedings to be remitted back to the Settlement Commission for decision. The petitioner&#039;s counsel undertook to cooperate and not seek further adjournments. The Court expected the Commission to expedite the disposal of the remitted proceedings within three months. No specific costs were awarded in the disposition of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>