<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47564</link>
    <description>In claims for deemed Modvat credit under a conditional exemption notification, the assessee must assert the claim and cooperate by producing relevant material, but the Revenue must verify the claim and establish that any exception defeating the credit is actually attracted. The mere existence of the notification does not by itself show that the inputs are clearly recognizable as non-duty paid or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The Court followed the Supreme Court&#039;s approach that the burden cannot be placed entirely on the purchaser to prove actual duty payment in this context, and the assessee was held entitled to the benefit of deemed Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:11:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47564</link>
      <description>In claims for deemed Modvat credit under a conditional exemption notification, the assessee must assert the claim and cooperate by producing relevant material, but the Revenue must verify the claim and establish that any exception defeating the credit is actually attracted. The mere existence of the notification does not by itself show that the inputs are clearly recognizable as non-duty paid or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The Court followed the Supreme Court&#039;s approach that the burden cannot be placed entirely on the purchaser to prove actual duty payment in this context, and the assessee was held entitled to the benefit of deemed Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>