<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780377</link>
    <description>HC held the assessment order under s.73 TNGST/CGST for 2020-21 was passed in breach of natural justice because only Form GST ASMT-10 and DRC-01A notices (16.10.2024) were served and DRC-01 copies were not uploaded; the petitioner had filed replies dated 10.12.2024 and 21.01.2025. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted to the revenue to decide afresh on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780377</link>
      <description>HC held the assessment order under s.73 TNGST/CGST for 2020-21 was passed in breach of natural justice because only Form GST ASMT-10 and DRC-01A notices (16.10.2024) were served and DRC-01 copies were not uploaded; the petitioner had filed replies dated 10.12.2024 and 21.01.2025. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted to the revenue to decide afresh on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>