https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780381 HC found that the order invoking jurisdiction under s.161 of the GST enactments confirmed tax, interest and penalty without hearing the petitioner in person, violating natural justice. The court nonetheless observed the petitioner had protracted litigation and misused s.161, which is confined to correcting apparent errors. The petition was disposed with a direction that the petitioner deposit the full disputed tax of Rs. 11,33,488 within 30 days of receipt of the order. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:29:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780381 HC found that the order invoking jurisdiction under s.161 of the GST enactments confirmed tax, interest and penalty without hearing the petitioner in person, violating natural justice. The court nonetheless observed the petitioner had protracted litigation and misused s.161, which is confined to correcting apparent errors. The petition was disposed with a direction that the petitioner deposit the full disputed tax of Rs. 11,33,488 within 30 days of receipt of the order. Case-Laws GST Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780381