<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780366</link>
    <description>Notifications issued under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 for levy of service tax on transportation of goods by vessel from outside India to customs stations in India were found unsustainable for want of a proper machinery provision and for being inconsistent with constitutional constraints invoked under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245 and 269A. On that basis, the consequential show cause notices for recovery of service tax also could not survive and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780366</link>
      <description>Notifications issued under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 for levy of service tax on transportation of goods by vessel from outside India to customs stations in India were found unsustainable for want of a proper machinery provision and for being inconsistent with constitutional constraints invoked under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245 and 269A. On that basis, the consequential show cause notices for recovery of service tax also could not survive and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>