<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1165 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780369</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the belated special leave petition as barred by delay (429 days) and refused to condone the delay. The Court noted settled HC law that reopening under s.147 requires a live or close nexus between information before the ITO and a bona fide belief of escapement of income; powers to reopen are not plenary and vague, distant, or far-fetched material cannot justify reopening. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the HC decision was therefore not entertained due to procedural delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1165 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780369</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the belated special leave petition as barred by delay (429 days) and refused to condone the delay. The Court noted settled HC law that reopening under s.147 requires a live or close nexus between information before the ITO and a bona fide belief of escapement of income; powers to reopen are not plenary and vague, distant, or far-fetched material cannot justify reopening. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the HC decision was therefore not entertained due to procedural delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>