<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal finds imported automatic car new; concessional duty allowed; Rule 12 and Rule 3 overturned; s.112(a), s.114AA penalties quashed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93639</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and held that the appellant imported a new automatic car entitled to the concessional duty under the Notification. The Tribunal found the inspection report established the vehicle was new and that prior UK registration for transit/export formalities did not defeat new-car status. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection of declared value under Rule 12 (and re-determination under Rule 3) of the Valuation Rules 2007 was unwarranted; therefore no additional customs duty was exigible. Consequential measures - confiscation and penalties under s.112(a) or s.114AA of the Customs Act - were held unsustainable. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal finds imported automatic car new; concessional duty allowed; Rule 12 and Rule 3 overturned; s.112(a), s.114AA penalties quashed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93639</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and held that the appellant imported a new automatic car entitled to the concessional duty under the Notification. The Tribunal found the inspection report established the vehicle was new and that prior UK registration for transit/export formalities did not defeat new-car status. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection of declared value under Rule 12 (and re-determination under Rule 3) of the Valuation Rules 2007 was unwarranted; therefore no additional customs duty was exigible. Consequential measures - confiscation and penalties under s.112(a) or s.114AA of the Customs Act - were held unsustainable. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>