<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1135 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780339</link>
    <description>The special foreign exchange statute, rather than the general procedural rules on abatement and substitution, governed an application to bring a deceased appellant&#039;s legal heir on record. Because the repealed and successor enactments expressly preserved the right of legal representatives to continue the pending appeal and prescribed no limitation period for impleadment, the delay was assessed on sufficient cause. The long gap in listing, together with the applicant&#039;s lack of knowledge of the death until the matter was re-listed, was treated as a satisfactory explanation. The delay was condoned and the legal heir was permitted to continue the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1135 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780339</link>
      <description>The special foreign exchange statute, rather than the general procedural rules on abatement and substitution, governed an application to bring a deceased appellant&#039;s legal heir on record. Because the repealed and successor enactments expressly preserved the right of legal representatives to continue the pending appeal and prescribed no limitation period for impleadment, the delay was assessed on sufficient cause. The long gap in listing, together with the applicant&#039;s lack of knowledge of the death until the matter was re-listed, was treated as a satisfactory explanation. The delay was condoned and the legal heir was permitted to continue the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>