<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1139 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780343</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that the impugned reassessment of customs duty on imported pre-packaged goods to an RSP-based value was unsustainable and set aside the order, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal found the proper officer may ensure RSP marking reflects the declared transaction price until clearance under s.47 Customs Act, but has no power to revise the declared import valuation post-clearance or convert the transaction price used for BCD into an excise-style RSP valuation. Power under s.28 to revisit assessment was not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1139 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780343</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that the impugned reassessment of customs duty on imported pre-packaged goods to an RSP-based value was unsustainable and set aside the order, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal found the proper officer may ensure RSP marking reflects the declared transaction price until clearance under s.47 Customs Act, but has no power to revise the declared import valuation post-clearance or convert the transaction price used for BCD into an excise-style RSP valuation. Power under s.28 to revisit assessment was not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>