<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1642 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464409</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the appellate authority first decide the jurisdictional objections raised against the notices and orders issued under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and then consider the interim relief application expeditiously. The Court did not decide the merits of the reassessment challenge at this stage and instead required the threshold jurisdictional issues to be addressed before further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1642 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464409</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the appellate authority first decide the jurisdictional objections raised against the notices and orders issued under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and then consider the interim relief application expeditiously. The Court did not decide the merits of the reassessment challenge at this stage and instead required the threshold jurisdictional issues to be addressed before further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>