https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47541 A binding CBEC circular clarified that where one MRP is scored out and another printed MRP remains on the package, the package cannot be treated as showing two MRPs for revenue action. That clarification governed the field and required the revenue authorities to act consistently with it. Earlier contrary circulars and consequential letters could not continue to operate against the later binding clarification. The petition was therefore disposed of, and the interim order was vacated as having become infructuous. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:18:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47541 A binding CBEC circular clarified that where one MRP is scored out and another printed MRP remains on the package, the package cannot be treated as showing two MRPs for revenue action. That clarification governed the field and required the revenue authorities to act consistently with it. Earlier contrary circulars and consequential letters could not continue to operate against the later binding clarification. The petition was therefore disposed of, and the interim order was vacated as having become infructuous. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47541