<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s evidence of identity, creditworthiness, repayments leads to deletion of s.68 additions; tax officer failed to invoke s.131 or s.133(6)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93610</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted additions made u/s 68 treating unsecured loans as unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal held that the assessee discharged the evidentiary onus by furnishing identity and creditworthiness documents (PAN/Aadhaar, loan confirmations, bank statements, ITRs and land records) and evidence of repayments, and that the AO proceeded with a pre-determined mind without invoking statutory powers of enquiry u/s 131 or s.133(6). Having failed to make independent enquiries or assess the alleged creditors, the AO could not sustain the additions; the burden shifted to the Revenue and no further proof justified invoking s.68, hence the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s evidence of identity, creditworthiness, repayments leads to deletion of s.68 additions; tax officer failed to invoke s.131 or s.133(6)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93610</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted additions made u/s 68 treating unsecured loans as unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal held that the assessee discharged the evidentiary onus by furnishing identity and creditworthiness documents (PAN/Aadhaar, loan confirmations, bank statements, ITRs and land records) and evidence of repayments, and that the AO proceeded with a pre-determined mind without invoking statutory powers of enquiry u/s 131 or s.133(6). Having failed to make independent enquiries or assess the alleged creditors, the AO could not sustain the additions; the burden shifted to the Revenue and no further proof justified invoking s.68, hence the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>