https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780276 CESTAT held that charges of clandestine removal against the firm lacked independent corroborative evidence and relied improperly on third-party statements; consequently the demand and penalties under Rule 26 CE Rules, 2002 against the partners were unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the fines and penalties imposed by the Commissioner, allowed the appeals, and remitted no further liability against the appellants on the disputed clandestine removal findings. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780276 CESTAT held that charges of clandestine removal against the firm lacked independent corroborative evidence and relied improperly on third-party statements; consequently the demand and penalties under Rule 26 CE Rules, 2002 against the partners were unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the fines and penalties imposed by the Commissioner, allowed the appeals, and remitted no further liability against the appellants on the disputed clandestine removal findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780276