<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1081 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780285</link>
    <description>CESTAT (Allahabad) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, holding that seizures of foreign-origin gold brought in concealed baggage during travel constitute baggage-seizure matters for which this Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pursue alternative remedies before the appropriate forum, if available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1081 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780285</link>
      <description>CESTAT (Allahabad) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, holding that seizures of foreign-origin gold brought in concealed baggage during travel constitute baggage-seizure matters for which this Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pursue alternative remedies before the appropriate forum, if available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>