<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 98 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47534</link>
    <description>Availability of an alternate statutory remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge involves breach of natural justice. In this customs classification matter, the High Court held that failure to timely disclose the test reports and to afford an effective opportunity to prepare for and conduct cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner deprived the assessee of a fair hearing. The adjudication orders were therefore vitiated, quashed, and remanded for fresh decision after effective disclosure and hearing; the consequential demand could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 98 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47534</link>
      <description>Availability of an alternate statutory remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge involves breach of natural justice. In this customs classification matter, the High Court held that failure to timely disclose the test reports and to afford an effective opportunity to prepare for and conduct cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner deprived the assessee of a fair hearing. The adjudication orders were therefore vitiated, quashed, and remanded for fresh decision after effective disclosure and hearing; the consequential demand could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>