<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780302</link>
    <description>ITAT, Visakhapatnam held that a belated return filed on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice is a valid return despite delay. The AO wrongly treated the return as invalid, withdrew the s.143(2) notice and framed assessment u/s 144. Section 292BB cannot cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the assessment order passed u/s 144 was quashed for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780302</link>
      <description>ITAT, Visakhapatnam held that a belated return filed on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice is a valid return despite delay. The AO wrongly treated the return as invalid, withdrew the s.143(2) notice and framed assessment u/s 144. Section 292BB cannot cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the assessment order passed u/s 144 was quashed for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>