https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780317 The HC dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting absence of the section 148 notice copy and that a final assessment order dated 31.12.2009 had already been passed and not yet challenged by the petitioner. The court held it could not grant a mandamus to set aside a long-standing notice or re-open issues of fact, and observed the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy under the Income Tax Act to challenge the assessment; accordingly the writ was not retained for adjudication. en-us Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:33:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780317 The HC dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting absence of the section 148 notice copy and that a final assessment order dated 31.12.2009 had already been passed and not yet challenged by the petitioner. The court held it could not grant a mandamus to set aside a long-standing notice or re-open issues of fact, and observed the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy under the Income Tax Act to challenge the assessment; accordingly the writ was not retained for adjudication. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780317