<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464379</link>
    <description>A 6-day delay in filing the appeal was explained to the NCLAT&#039;s satisfaction and condoned. The appeal challenged admission of a Section 7 application against a corporate guarantor, and the Tribunal directed issuance of notice to the respondents for further hearing. Pending consideration of the appeal, the Tribunal granted interim protection by restraining issuance of Form G, while allowing the CIRP to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464379</link>
      <description>A 6-day delay in filing the appeal was explained to the NCLAT&#039;s satisfaction and condoned. The appeal challenged admission of a Section 7 application against a corporate guarantor, and the Tribunal directed issuance of notice to the respondents for further hearing. Pending consideration of the appeal, the Tribunal granted interim protection by restraining issuance of Form G, while allowing the CIRP to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>