<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2144 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464393</link>
    <description>HC admitted the appeal, framing the substantial question of law whether a depreciable asset, though a long-term capital asset, is entitled to the lower tax rate under Section 112. Registry was directed to furnish the order to the Tribunal so the Tribunal can retain relevant papers and proceedings for production when required. Service was waived by the respondent&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2144 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464393</link>
      <description>HC admitted the appeal, framing the substantial question of law whether a depreciable asset, though a long-term capital asset, is entitled to the lower tax rate under Section 112. Registry was directed to furnish the order to the Tribunal so the Tribunal can retain relevant papers and proceedings for production when required. Service was waived by the respondent&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>