<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464396</link>
    <description>Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act was held not to raise any substantial question of law because the Tribunal had applied the ruling in Era Infrastructure, which governed the controversy. On that basis, the court found no ground for interference in appeal and dismissed the matter, resulting in a decision against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:01:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464396</link>
      <description>Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act was held not to raise any substantial question of law because the Tribunal had applied the ruling in Era Infrastructure, which governed the controversy. On that basis, the court found no ground for interference in appeal and dismissed the matter, resulting in a decision against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>