<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 97 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47523</link>
    <description>A related-party relationship between an assessee and its subsidiary, by itself, is insufficient to invoke the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue must prove that the relationship affected the sale price by introducing consideration beyond purely commercial terms; absent such evidence, valuation under the related-party rules cannot be applied. On the stated facts, no material supported the departmental case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 97 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47523</link>
      <description>A related-party relationship between an assessee and its subsidiary, by itself, is insufficient to invoke the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue must prove that the relationship affected the sale price by introducing consideration beyond purely commercial terms; absent such evidence, valuation under the related-party rules cannot be applied. On the stated facts, no material supported the departmental case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>