<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47522</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision classifying the product &quot;Herbonic&quot; tonic under Chapter 20 of the Tariff Act, specifically sub-heading 2001.90, as it consists of a mixture of assorted vegetation, dry fruits, and seeds. The Court found that the specific description in Chapter 20 prevails over the general heading in Chapter 21. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47522</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision classifying the product &quot;Herbonic&quot; tonic under Chapter 20 of the Tariff Act, specifically sub-heading 2001.90, as it consists of a mixture of assorted vegetation, dry fruits, and seeds. The Court found that the specific description in Chapter 20 prevails over the general heading in Chapter 21. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>