<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment under s.143(3) quashed where s.143(2) notice issued by non-jurisdictional ITO; jurisdictional DCIT required for returns over â‚¹20 lakh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93589</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the assessment framed under s. 143(3) as the statutory scrutiny notice under s. 143(2) was issued by a non-jurisdictional ITO instead of the DCIT who alone had jurisdiction given the assessee&#039;s return exceeded Rs.20 lakh. The Tribunal held the assessment initiation was vitiated by jurisdictional defect, not curable, because the required jurisdictional officer did not issue the s. 143(2) notice nor complete the assessment. Having regard to settled coordinate bench rulings, the assessment was declared invalid and set aside, and the assessee&#039;s additional grounds challenging validity were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:17:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment under s.143(3) quashed where s.143(2) notice issued by non-jurisdictional ITO; jurisdictional DCIT required for returns over â‚¹20 lakh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93589</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the assessment framed under s. 143(3) as the statutory scrutiny notice under s. 143(2) was issued by a non-jurisdictional ITO instead of the DCIT who alone had jurisdiction given the assessee&#039;s return exceeded Rs.20 lakh. The Tribunal held the assessment initiation was vitiated by jurisdictional defect, not curable, because the required jurisdictional officer did not issue the s. 143(2) notice nor complete the assessment. Having regard to settled coordinate bench rulings, the assessment was declared invalid and set aside, and the assessee&#039;s additional grounds challenging validity were allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:17:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>