<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1045 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780249</link>
    <description>HC found prima facie merit in the petition challenging the respondent authority&#039;s refusal to revalidate import licences but declined to issue a mandamus or pre-emptory direction for revalidation. Instead, HC directed the PRC to re-examine the petitioner&#039;s revalidation requests in light of relevant facts, including treatment of similarly situated importers, and to issue a reasoned decision expeditiously and preferably within six weeks. The petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1045 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780249</link>
      <description>HC found prima facie merit in the petition challenging the respondent authority&#039;s refusal to revalidate import licences but declined to issue a mandamus or pre-emptory direction for revalidation. Instead, HC directed the PRC to re-examine the petitioner&#039;s revalidation requests in light of relevant facts, including treatment of similarly situated importers, and to issue a reasoned decision expeditiously and preferably within six weeks. The petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>